PLPersonaLattice
PUBLIC READ-ONLY DEMOPrivate admin

SYNTHETIC INVESTIGATION WORKSPACE

Synthetic M6 Subject

This mirrors the operator evidence hierarchy using fixed synthetic data. No provider requests are executed from this demo and no visitor can submit a real-person research job.

observations
5
candidates
2
claims
1
hard conflicts
1
Interpretation boundary

Candidate factors below are deterministic evidence-strength triage. They are grouped by evidentiary direction, remain uncalibrated and non-probabilistic, and a hard contradiction can veto positive evidence.

REVIEWED DOCUMENT / SAFE SIMULATION

Extracted clues stay inert until human review

synthetic artifact · local state only

This fixture mirrors the private reviewed-document workflow without accepting a file, retaining a document, creating an operator session or calling an API. Every control below changes browser-memory demo state only.

synthetic-intake-brief.pdfsanitized fixture · 2 extracted candidates
usernameatlas_zerosynthetic page 2 · chars 418–428
pending · research not authorized
domainatlas-labs.examplesynthetic page 3 · chars 121–138
rejected · research not authorized

RETAINED CASES / SAFE SIMULATION

Search, filter and switch synthetic cases

browser-memory fixture only

This mirrors private retained-case navigation without listing private records, opening retained storage or making a network request.

Current workspace contextAlex Rowan

active · evidence retained · person · 2026-08-30 18:42 UTC

Destructive case mutation is intentionally disabled in the public observer.

01 / SOURCE EXECUTION

Typed source-run states

4 non-result states · simulated

These rows are deterministic demonstrations of the private operator state vocabulary. They do not describe live requests and do not add observations to this synthetic case.

sourcestatereasonattemptedobservations
Synthetic profile APIexecutedresults returnedyes2
Synthetic exact registrynot foundno matchyes0
Synthetic metered sourceunavailableoptional not configuredno0
Synthetic reviewed sourcereview requiredreview gateno0
Synthetic remote sourceunavailableremote rate limityes0

02 / CORRELATION

Account candidates

2 reviewed
sherlock

GitHub

insufficient evidence
https://github.com/synthetic-m6

Non-probabilistic factor assessment. Direction follows retained M5 weight/veto semantics; rationale wording alone does not create negative evidence.

Supporting factors · 1 retained

  • same usernameSame public handle only.
    +10

Conflicting factors · 0 retained

No retained factors in this direction.

Neutral / withheld factors · 0 retained

No retained factors in this direction.

Inspect model mechanics
10
internal evidence-strength index / 100uncalibrated · not an identity probabilitypolicy m5-evidence-strength-v1 · evaluated 2026-08-16 10:00:00 UTC
sherlock

Reddit

contradicted
https://www.reddit.com/user/synthetic-m6

Non-probabilistic factor assessment. Direction follows retained M5 weight/veto semantics; rationale wording alone does not create negative evidence.

Supporting factors · 1 retained

  • exact confirmed identifier overlapSynthetic confirmed email overlap.
    +55

Conflicting factors · 1 retained

  • hard contradictionSynthetic hard contradiction.
    veto

Neutral / withheld factors · 1 retained

  • independent cross linkSynthetic cross-link is stale.
    stale
Inspect model mechanics
0
internal evidence-strength index / 100uncalibrated · not an identity probabilitypolicy m5-evidence-strength-v1 · evaluated 2026-08-16 10:00:00 UTC

03 / EVIDENCE

Observation timeline

provenance retained
  1. Expired synthetic cross-link.

    synthetic-stale-cross-link · public_web · stale

    retrieved 2026-07-27 10:00:00 UTC · expires 2026-08-15 10:00:00 UTC

    https://archive.example.test/profile
  2. Synthetic portfolio repeats the confirmed email.

    synthetic-email-proof · public_web · fresh

    retrieved 2026-08-15 10:00:00 UTC · expires 2026-08-21 10:00:00 UTC

    https://portfolio.example.test/contact
  3. Synthetic source establishes incompatible account ownership.

    synthetic-contradiction · public_web · fresh

    retrieved 2026-08-16 06:00:00 UTC · expires 2026-08-21 10:00:00 UTC

    https://contradiction.example.test/fact
  4. Reddit

    sherlock · provider · fresh

    retrieved 2026-08-16 07:00:00 UTC · expires 2026-08-21 10:00:00 UTC

    https://www.reddit.com/user/synthetic-m6
  5. GitHub

    sherlock · provider · fresh

    retrieved 2026-08-16 08:00:00 UTC · expires 2026-08-21 10:00:00 UTC

    https://github.com/synthetic-m6

04 / EVIDENCE PATH

Clue → evidence → operator decision

fixture-derived graph

This compact graph view traces how a retained clue reaches a candidate, which observations influence M5, where a contradiction enters, and which non-probabilistic outcome remains for human review.

username: synthetic-m6clue → GitHub candidate
insufficient evidence

same username → GitHub → decision insufficient evidence

username: synthetic-m6clue → Reddit candidate
contradicted

exact confirmed identifier overlap → Synthetic portfolio repeats the confirmed email. · hard contradiction → Synthetic source establishes incompatible account ownership. → contradiction veto · independent cross link → Expired synthetic cross-link. → decision contradicted

05 / CLAIM REVIEW

Claims, exceptions and open questions

2 unresolved · human review required
stored human claim

Synthetic portfolio lists the confirmed email address.

  • supportsSynthetic portfolio repeats the confirmed email.
  • unresolvedSynthetic source establishes incompatible account ownership.
exception state

Positive signals do not erase the contradiction.

The Reddit candidate remains contradicted because a hard conflict veto is present; stale supporting evidence is still shown rather than silently removed.

Synthetic portfolio lists the confirmed email address.open question
unresolved claim link

Synthetic source establishes incompatible account ownership. · Contradiction remains visible for operator review.

GitHub candidateopen question
insufficient evidence

The retained M5 outcome does not support an identity conclusion; more independent evidence or human review is required.

06 / OPERATOR LIFECYCLE

Private actions, public-safe states

read-only simulation

The private workbench includes write-capable and authenticated lifecycle steps. This observer mirrors their meaning without creating a session, accepting an upload, retaining a case or exposing an enabled mutation path.

Case intakeCreate a retained case from reviewed clues
simulated only

The observer shows accepted clue concepts but never accepts a real-person submission or creates storage.

Reviewed documentPreview, review and explicitly admit extracted clues
interactive fixture

The safe simulation above mirrors confirm, reject, re-review, promotion and case-start boundaries without a file input, upload endpoint or document retention.

Retained casesSearch, switch and reopen retained investigations
synthetic navigation

Case-switching semantics are represented with fixed labels; the visitor cannot list or read private retained cases.

Delete caseConfirm destructive deletion of a retained case
disabled demo

The destructive boundary is visible but cannot mutate the fixture or call a deletion endpoint.

Session boundaryExpire or end the authenticated operator session
not authenticated

Logout and expiry concepts are shown as product states; this static observer never creates an admin session.

07 / WORKSPACE STATES

Loading, failure and coverage semantics

deterministic simulation

The private workbench keeps empty, error, partial and complete states distinct so missing evidence is not over-interpreted. These examples are fixed explanatory states and never trigger network activity.

Case loadingRetained-case history is still being fetched
loading

The private workbench marks the case list busy and locks remote actions while loading. This observer demonstrates that state without making a request.

Case index unavailableRetained-case history failed to load
error

A failed index is not an empty workspace. The operator must refresh before concluding that no retained cases exist.

Research completed with limitsOne or more provider attempts failed or source states remain unresolved
partial

Usable evidence stays visible while incomplete source coverage remains explicit. Review source states before treating the case as complete.

Some source paths were not attemptedConfiguration, routing, review, budget or policy stopped provider contact
limited

Missing observations from an unattempted path are a coverage limit, not negative evidence about the subject or claim.

No retained match from attempted sourcesEvery attempted source returned no match
quiet

Source silence is not evidence that the subject or claim does not exist elsewhere.

Attempted sources completedEvery attempted source reached a terminal result
complete

Completion applies only to the bounded configured source set; it does not imply exhaustive coverage.